We Speak English, Arabic, and Spanish
CALL TO Schedule a In-Depth
Confidential Consultation
(786) 706-8802
We Speak English, Arabic, and Spanish
CALL TO Schedule a In-Depth
Confidential Consultation
What every parent in Florida must know about parenting plan requirements, timesharing schedules, and protecting your child's best interests in court.
Under Florida Statute 61.13, every divorce or paternity case involving minor children requires a court-approved parenting plan. The plan must detail each parent's decision-making responsibilities, a timesharing schedule, and a communication framework. Florida courts approve parenting plans based on the best interests of the child standard, evaluating factors such as the stability of each home, the child's school and community ties, and each parent's ability to foster a relationship with the other parent.
A Florida parenting plan is a court-approved written agreement that outlines how separated or divorced parents will share in raising their minor children. It is not optional. Florida law mandates that a parenting plan be established in every case involving minor children, regardless of whether the parents were married.
Florida Statute 61.13(2)(b) specifies that every parenting plan must include at least the following components:
A detailed schedule of which days and overnights each parent has with the child, including holidays, school breaks, and birthdays.
Which parent is responsible for school enrollment, school choice, parent-teacher communication, and educational support.
Who makes decisions about routine and emergency medical care, dental appointments, mental health services, and health insurance.
How parents will communicate with each other and how the child will communicate with the non-residential parent during the other parent's time.
Who decides which activities the child participates in, and how the associated costs and transportation are divided.
Rules for travel outside the state or country, notice requirements, and procedures for longer-term relocation requests.
Florida strongly prefers that parents reach their own parenting agreement, either through direct negotiation or family mediation. A mutually agreed plan, once approved by a judge, carries the same legal weight as a court order. When parents cannot agree, a judge conducts an evidentiary hearing and issues a parenting plan based solely on the child's best interests.
Parents in Miami and throughout South Florida who enter the process with clearly organized, detailed proposals tend to fare better in negotiations and at hearings. A vague or incomplete plan invites future conflict.
When a judge reviews a proposed parenting plan, the governing standard is the best interests of the child. Florida Statute 61.13(3) provides an extensive list of factors courts must consider. No single factor is determinative; judges weigh all relevant circumstances.
Key factors courts examine include:
Florida courts evaluate each parent's moral fitness, including judgment and conduct in environments to which the child may be exposed. Beyond individual fitness, courts place significant weight on each parent's willingness to co-parent. A parent who undermines the child's relationship with the other parent, makes false accusations, or refuses to communicate constructively can face a reduction in their timesharing.
A history of domestic violence carries substantial weight in Florida custody determinations. Under Florida Statute 61.13(2)(c), there is a rebuttable presumption against granting sole or shared parental responsibility to a parent who has committed domestic violence, as defined by statute. Courts may order supervised timesharing or no timesharing in serious cases.
Important: If domestic violence is a factor in your case, document all incidents thoroughly and consult an attorney before filing or responding to any parenting plan petition. Protective orders and parenting plan proceedings often run concurrently, and each affects the other.
Florida courts may consider the preference of a child who is old enough and mature enough to form an intelligent opinion. There is no statutory age at which a child's preference becomes controlling. A judge will evaluate the child's age, maturity, and whether the preference appears genuine or coached.
Whether you are going through a divorce or establishing paternity, the parenting plan process follows a structured path in Florida courts. Understanding each stage helps parents prepare effectively and avoid costly delays.
A timesharing schedule is the backbone of any Florida parenting plan. It specifies, with precision, the days and overnights each parent has with the child throughout the year, including weekdays, weekends, holidays, and school breaks. Vague schedules that rely on "reasonable access" tend to generate future disputes.
| Schedule Type | Structure | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| 50/50 Equal Timesharing | Alternating weeks, 2-2-3 rotation, or week-on/week-off | Parents in proximity; cooperative co-parents; school-age children |
| 60/40 Schedule | Every other weekend, plus one weeknight with the secondary parent | Situations where one parent works irregular hours or travels frequently |
| 70/30 Schedule | Every other weekend with one midweek overnight | Cases requiring geographic stability; very young children with strong attachment to primary parent |
| Supervised Timesharing | Visits occur at a designated facility or in the presence of a court-approved supervisor. | History of domestic violence, substance abuse, or other safety concerns |
| Virtual Timesharing | Video calls, phone contact on designated days | Supplement during travel; long-distance arrangements |
Beyond the regular schedule, Florida parenting plans must address how major holidays are divided, including Thanksgiving, winter break, spring break, summer vacation, and each parent's birthday and the child's birthday. Most plans alternate holidays annually. Without explicit holiday provisions, parents must return to court each time a dispute arises.
Parental responsibility refers to the authority to make major decisions in a child's life, distinct from the child's place of residence. Florida law distinguishes between shared parental responsibility and sole parental responsibility.
Florida courts strongly favor shared parental responsibility, which requires both parents to confer and agree on major decisions affecting the child's welfare, education, healthcare, and religious upbringing. Neither parent can unilaterally override the other on these significant matters.
Shared responsibility does not necessarily mean equal timesharing. A parent can have the majority of overnights and still share decision-making authority with the other parent. The two concepts operate independently.
Sole parental responsibility is reserved for situations where shared decision-making would be harmful to the child. Courts require compelling evidence before awarding sole responsibility to one parent, such as documented abuse, severe mental illness, or a parent's persistent refusal to cooperate. In Palm Beach and Miami courts, sole responsibility awards are relatively uncommon outside of high-conflict cases involving safety concerns.
In some cases, courts award shared parental responsibility but grant one parent "ultimate decision-making authority" over a specific domain, such as education, when the parents have a history of deadlock on that issue. This is a nuanced arrangement that requires careful drafting to avoid future litigation.
Life circumstances change, and Florida law recognizes that a parenting plan that served a child well at age three may be inappropriate at age twelve. However, courts impose a significant threshold before allowing modifications to ensure stability.
To obtain a modification, the requesting parent must demonstrate:
Courts have found the following to constitute substantial changes warranting modification: a parent's interstate relocation, a significant change in a child's medical or educational needs, a parent's new domestic partnership that raises safety concerns, documented substance abuse, and a child's strong preference as they enter adolescence.
If a parent seeks to relocate more than 50 miles from the current residence, Florida Statute 61.13001 requires either a written agreement from the other parent or a court order. Relocation without consent or a court order is grounds for the relocating parent to lose timesharing. This is one of the most contentious family law issues in Florida, particularly in high-growth areas like Miami and Palm Beach.
A poorly drafted parenting plan creates ambiguity, which inevitably leads to future disputes, additional attorney fees, and stress for both parents and children. These are the mistakes Florida family law attorneys most frequently encounter.
Parenting plan disputes require more than legal knowledge. They require an attorney who understands what courts in Miami, Palm Beach, and throughout Florida prioritize, and who can present your case in a way that speaks directly to your child's best interests.
Our practice is dedicated to Florida family law. We know the local courts, judges, and standards applied in Miami-Dade and Palm Beach Counties.
We draft parenting plans that close every loophole. Ambiguity is the enemy of a stable co-parenting arrangement, and our documents are built to last.
We prepare clients thoroughly for mediation, which resolves the majority of Florida parenting cases without a trial and at significantly lower cost.
When a case cannot settle, we are prepared to litigate. We present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and make the strongest possible case for our clients.
We handle post-judgment modifications and enforcement actions when circumstances change, and an existing parenting plan no longer serves the child's needs.
Family law matters are urgent. We maintain clear, consistent communication with every client throughout the process, from the initial consultation to the final order.
No. Florida law does not mandate equal timesharing. While the 2023 amendment to Florida Statute 61.13 created a rebuttable presumption in favor of equal timesharing in many cases, courts still conduct an individualized analysis based on the best interests of the child. A parent can rebut the presumption by demonstrating, for example, that equal timesharing is geographically impractical, inconsistent with the child's school schedule, or not appropriate given one parent's work schedule or history.
Parents may informally adjust their schedule by mutual agreement, but informal arrangements are not legally enforceable. If circumstances change significantly, the proper method is to file a supplemental petition for modification with the circuit court. Courts will evaluate whether a substantial, material, and unanticipated change in circumstances has occurred and whether the proposed modification serves the child's best interests. Informal agreements that are not court-ordered can be difficult to enforce if one parent later refuses to honor them.
Violating a court-approved parenting plan is a serious matter in Florida. The non-violating parent may file a motion for contempt of court. If the judge finds the violation willful, consequences can include make-up timesharing, payment of the other parent's attorney fees, fines, and, in egregious cases, modification of timesharing in favor of the compliant parent. Repeated or serious violations, such as refusing to return a child, can result in criminal charges under Florida law.
There is no specific age in Florida law at which a child may independently choose which parent to live with. A judge may consider the preference of a child who is sufficiently mature and old enough to form an intelligent opinion. Still, the preference is one factor among many in the best interests analysis. Even a teenager's preference can be overridden if the court determines that living with the preferred parent would not serve the child's best interests. At age 18, a child is legally an adult, and the parenting plan no longer applies.
Yes. Under Florida Statute 61.13, every divorce or paternity case involving minor children must include a court-approved parenting plan before the case can be finalized. This requirement applies regardless of whether the parents are cooperative or in dispute.
If parents cannot reach an agreement through negotiation or mediation, the court will hold an evidentiary hearing and impose a parenting plan based on the best interests of the child, weighing all factors in Florida Statute 61.13(3). Having an experienced attorney to present evidence at this hearing is critical.
A Florida parenting plan must include a detailed timesharing schedule, an allocation of parental responsibilities for education, healthcare, and extracurricular activities, and a communication framework between the parents. Courts may also require provisions addressing travel, holiday schedules, and dispute resolution.
Florida law recognizes a rebuttable presumption in favor of equal timesharing following a 2023 statutory amendment. However, courts still conduct a full best-interests analysis and may deviate from equal timesharing when circumstances warrant it.
Relocation of more than 50 miles from the child's current residence requires either written consent from the other parent or a court order under Florida Statute 61.13001. Relocating without consent or court approval can result in the parent losing timesharing or facing contempt sanctions.
Uncontested cases where both parents agree can be finalized in as few as 60 to 90 days after filing. Contested cases that proceed to trial can take one to two years or more, depending on the complexity of the issues and the court's docket in the county where the case is filed.
Florida parenting plan disputes are among the most consequential legal proceedings a parent can face. At Altawil Law Group, we help families across Miami, Palm Beach, and throughout Florida navigate this process with clarity and purpose.
"*" indicates required fields
Our Florida Location
Downtown Miami Office : 169 E Flagler St, Suite 700, Miami, FL 33131
"*" indicates required fields