We Speak English, Arabic, and Spanish
CALL TO Schedule a In-Depth
Confidential Consultation
(786) 706-8802
We Speak English, Arabic, and Spanish
CALL TO Schedule a In-Depth
Confidential Consultation
Under Florida Statute 61.13, time-sharing is the court-ordered schedule that determines when a child spends time with each parent. Florida courts do not use the term "custody" in the same way as many other states do. Instead, every case involving minor children must produce a court-approved parenting plan that includes a detailed time-sharing schedule. The controlling legal standard is the best interests of the child, and courts evaluate a specific list of statutory factors before approving any arrangement.
The shift in terminology was not cosmetic. Florida law now reflects the understanding that children generally benefit from meaningful, ongoing relationships with both parents, and that courts should not frame parenting as a win-lose competition. Instead, the law directs courts to evaluate what specific arrangement best serves the child's welfare, development, and stability.
Whether you are navigating a first-time parenting plan in Miami-Dade County, responding to a modification petition in Palm Beach, or dealing with a relocation dispute anywhere in Florida, understanding how time-sharing law works is the foundation of any effective legal strategy.
Time-sharing is the specific schedule that determines when a child physically resides with each parent. It is always documented within a parenting plan, the written, court-approved document that governs the co-parenting relationship following separation or divorce.
Unlike informal arrangements, a time-sharing schedule approved by a Florida court carries the full force of a court order. Violations can result in contempt proceedings, and significant or repeated violations can serve as grounds to modify who holds the majority of parenting time.
People often assume that time-sharing is just about which nights a child sleeps at which house. In practice, a complete Florida time-sharing schedule addresses far more:
The baseline schedule of weekday and weekend overnights, including school pickup, drop-off, and transitions between homes.
How major holidays, birthdays, school breaks, and summers are divided each year, typically on an alternating annual basis.
Who drives the child during transitions, where exchanges occur, and what happens when a parent is late or unavailable.
How the child communicates with the non-residential parent during the other parent's time, including calls, video, and messaging.
Notice requirements for out-of-state travel and procedures for requesting permanent relocation under Florida Statute 61.13001.
How disagreements about the schedule are handled, including whether the parents must attempt mediation before returning to court.
Florida courts provide standardized parenting plan forms, including a general form and a long-distance or relocation form for cases where parents live far apart. Using an approved form ensures the plan meets minimum statutory requirements. However, standardized forms often need substantial customization to reflect the real-world logistics of a specific family's situation. A plan that checks the boxes is rarely as durable as one that anticipates likely disputes and addresses them in advance.
Florida courts do not apply a formula or default automatically to equal time-sharing. Every determination is individualized. The governing standard is the best interests of the child, and Florida Statute 61.13(3) lists the specific factors a judge must evaluate.
The best interests standard is both the starting point and the endpoint of every Florida time-sharing analysis. A judge is not asking which parent deserves more time. The judge is asking what specific arrangement, in this specific family's circumstances, best supports this specific child's safety, stability, development, and well-being.
Florida courts must evaluate all relevant factors, which include:
Florida Statute 61.13 explicitly states that the court shall not show preference in determining time-sharing based on a parent's sex. A father seeking equal or majority timesharing has the same legal standing as a mother making the same argument. The evidence and the child's actual needs determine the outcome.
Florida courts are generally more persuaded by concrete evidence than by characterizations of the other parent. School records, medical appointment logs, communication histories, and documentation of day-to-day involvement carry more weight than claims alone. Parents who can demonstrate an active, consistent role in their child's life before litigation tend to achieve better time-sharing outcomes.
Practical note: If you anticipate a time-sharing dispute, begin documenting your parenting involvement now. Save school pick-up records, medical appointment confirmations, extracurricular participation, and any written communications with the other parent. Courts respond to records, not assertions.
Many parents and many online sources still use the word "custody" to describe Florida family law arrangements. The term is familiar but legally imprecise in Florida. Understanding the distinction matters because the legal framework is built around different concepts, and confusing them can lead to strategic errors in litigation.
In 2008, Florida restructured its family law statutes and moved away from "custody" and "visitation" as primary legal terms. The new framework uses three core concepts: the parenting plan (the governing document), time-sharing (the physical schedule), and parental responsibility (decision-making authority). These three elements work together but are legally distinct.
| Old Term | Current Florida Equivalent | What It Addresses |
|---|---|---|
| Sole Custody | Sole Parental Responsibility | One parent holds exclusive decision-making authority over major life decisions. |
| Joint Custody | Shared Parental Responsibility | Both parents confer and agree on major decisions for the child |
| Primary Custody | Majority Timesharing | The child spends the greater number of overnights with one parent |
| Visitation | Time-Sharing | The schedule of the time each parent spends with the child |
| Custodial Parent | Parent with Majority Timesharing | The parent with whom the child primarily resides |
A parent may have the majority time-sharing while still sharing parental responsibility equally with the other parent. Conversely, equal time-sharing does not automatically mean equal decision-making authority on every issue. Courts can, and do, split these arrangements when circumstances warrant. Understanding what you are actually asking the court for, and why, is essential before any hearing.
Parents frequently assume that equal time-sharing is guaranteed, that past informal routines will be replicated in a court order, or that whichever parent has historically been the primary caregiver will automatically receive majority time. Courts evaluate the current evidence and the child's current best interests. Past arrangements are relevant but not determinative.
Florida courts expect parenting plan time-sharing schedules to be detailed and self-executing. A schedule that requires parents to negotiate every transition invites conflict. The goal is a document that is clear enough for a parent or law enforcement officer to follow without ambiguity.
| Schedule Type | How It Works | Typical Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| 50/50 Alternating Weeks | Child alternates one full week with each parent | Parents in proximity; school-age children; cooperative co-parents |
| 2-2-3 Rotation | Child rotates on a 2-day, 2-day, 3-day cycle each week | Younger children who benefit from more frequent transitions, nearby parents |
| 60/40 Schedule | One parent has every other weekend and one weeknight overnight | Cases with geographic distance or irregular work schedules |
| 70/30 Schedule | Every other weekend with one midweek overnight | Cases where stability with a primary parent is prioritized; some safety concerns |
| Supervised Timesharing | Visits at a designated facility or with an approved supervisor | Domestic violence history, substance abuse, and estrangement from the child |
| Long-Distance Schedule | Extended visits during school breaks; virtual contact during the school year | Parents living more than 50 miles apart; post-relocation arrangements |
A time-sharing schedule that addresses only the regular week is incomplete. Strong Florida parenting plans address every major holiday by name, including Thanksgiving, winter break, spring break, Easter, Independence Day, Labor Day, Memorial Day, and Mother's and Father's Days. Most plans alternate major holidays each year, ensuring each parent has a predictable time with the child from year to year.
Summer schedules often differ substantially from the school-year routine. One parent may take extended blocks; the other may have the child for designated weeks. Camp schedules, family vacations, and childcare arrangements all intersect with the summer plan. Courts in Miami and Palm Beach regularly see disputes arise specifically because summer provisions were vague or omitted entirely in the original order.
Since the 2024 amendment to Florida Statute 61.13(2)(b)5, courts are now required to address exchange locations in the parenting plan when safety and the child's best interests require it. In high-conflict cases, exchanges may be ordered to occur at a neutral location, such as a police station, or through a court-supervised exchange program. Every plan should specify who provides transportation for each leg of the exchange.
Time-sharing and parental responsibility are the two central pillars of every Florida parenting plan. They address different questions: time-sharing answers when the child is with each parent; parental responsibility answers who makes major decisions about the child's life.
Florida courts strongly favor shared parental responsibility, which requires both parents to confer on and reach an agreement about major decisions affecting the child's education, healthcare, religious upbringing, and extracurricular activities. Neither parent can unilaterally make significant decisions in these areas without the other's agreement or a court order.
Shared parental responsibility does not mean equal time-sharing. A parent can have the child for 70 percent of overnights and still be required to consult the other parent on school enrollment or medical treatment decisions. The two concepts operate on separate tracks within the same parenting plan.
Sole parental responsibility, in which one parent holds exclusive decision-making authority, is reserved for cases in which shared responsibility would be detrimental to the child. Courts in Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County require compelling evidence before awarding sole responsibility: documented domestic violence, severe untreated mental illness, or a parent's demonstrated inability to cooperate on child-centered decisions are among the most common grounds.
In some cases, Florida courts order shared parental responsibility but grant one parent "ultimate decision-making authority" over a specific area, such as education or healthcare, when the parents have a documented history of deadlock on that topic. This arrangement preserves the co-parenting framework while providing a tie-breaker mechanism to avoid repeated litigation over the same category of decision.
A parenting plan approved by a Florida court is a binding court order. It can be changed, but Florida law sets a deliberate threshold to prevent repeated litigation and protect the stability children need after their parents separate.
To modify a time-sharing order in Florida, the requesting parent must demonstrate two things: first, that a substantial and material change in circumstances has occurred since the last order was entered; and second, that the proposed modification is in the child's best interests. Both elements must be proven; satisfying only one is not sufficient.
Florida courts have recognized the following as potentially meeting the substantial and material change standard:
Parents sometimes agree informally to adjust the schedule without returning to court. While this can work cooperatively in the short term, informal arrangements are not court orders and cannot be enforced if the cooperation breaks down. A parent who has been following an informal modified schedule for months may find it difficult to revert to the original order or to prove what the actual arrangement was. Lasting changes should be formalized through the court.
Under Florida Statute 61.13001, a parent who proposes to relocate more than 50 miles from the child's current principal residence must obtain either a written agreement from the other parent or a court order before relocating. Relocating without authorization is grounds for the court to return the child and, in serious cases, to shift the majority time-sharing arrangement to the non-relocating parent. This is among the most urgently litigated issues in Miami and Palm Beach family courts.
The decisions made during a time-sharing proceeding shape daily family life for years. These are the mistakes Florida family law attorneys most frequently encounter and are most likely to produce unfavorable outcomes.
Time-sharing disputes are not just legal proceedings. They determine how much of your child's daily life you will be part of. At Altawil Law Group, we bring focused preparation and practical strategy to every case, whether the goal is negotiating a plan that works or presenting your strongest case before a judge.
Our practice centers on Florida family law. We understand the statutory framework, the local courts, and the standards applied across Miami-Dade and Palm Beach County.
We draft time-sharing schedules that are detailed, unambiguous, and built to hold up when co-parenting becomes difficult. Vagueness is a liability we eliminate.
Most Florida time-sharing cases settle in mediation. We prepare clients thoroughly so they enter the room with a clear, child-centered proposal and the confidence to negotiate effectively.
When cases require trial, we build and present evidence that speaks directly to the statutory factors Florida judges apply. We are prepared to litigate when litigation is necessary.
We handle post-judgment modification petitions and contempt proceedings when existing orders are violated or circumstances change significantly.
From Miami-Dade Circuit Court to Palm Beach County Family Division, we understand local procedures, expectations, and how case presentation affects outcomes.
No. Florida does not mandate equal time-sharing in every case. A 2023 amendment to Florida Statute 61.13 created a rebuttable presumption in favor of equal time-sharing, meaning courts start with the assumption that equal time is appropriate. Still, either the parent can present evidence to rebut that presumption. Courts still conduct a full best-interests analysis and may deviate from equal time-sharing based on the child's school schedule, the geographic distance between the parents, each parent's work schedule, the child's developmental needs, or other statutory factors.
No. Unilaterally denying a parent's court-ordered time-sharing violates the court order and may result in contempt proceedings. Florida courts take compliance with parenting plan orders seriously. A parent who believes there is a genuine safety reason to withhold the child must seek emergency relief from the court, not simply deny access and explain later. Consistent denial of timesharing is one of the statutory factors that can lead to a modification of the parenting plan in favor of the compliant parent.
Florida Statute 61.13001 governs parental relocation. If a parent proposes to relocate more than 50 miles from the child's current principal residence, they must either obtain written consent from the other parent or file a relocation petition and obtain court approval. The court evaluates the relocation request using a separate set of statutory factors, including the reason for the move, the impact on the child's relationship with the non-relocating parent, and whether a modified time-sharing schedule can reasonably preserve that relationship. Relocating without consent or court approval is a serious violation that can result in the court ordering the child's return and modifying timesharing in the relocating parent's favor.
There is no specific age at which a child in Florida can independently decide their own time-sharing arrangement. A judge may consider the preference of a child who is sufficiently mature to form an intelligent opinion. Still, the child's preference is one factor among many in the best interests analysis, not a controlling one. Even a teenager's strong preference can be overridden if living with the preferred parent would not serve the child's best interests. At age 18, the child becomes a legal adult. Still, the parenting plan in the relocating parent's favor no longer applies.
Time-sharing is the court-approved schedule that specifies when a child spends time with each parent. It is a required component of every Florida parenting plan under Florida Statute 61.13 and governs everything from regular weekly overnights to holiday allocations and summer schedules.
Florida courts apply the best interests of the child standard, evaluating the statutory factors in Florida Statute 61.13(3). These include each parent's capacity to meet the child's needs, the stability of each home, each parent's willingness to support the child's relationship with the other parent, school and community ties, and any evidence of domestic violence or substance abuse.
Not exactly. Florida replaced most uses of "custody" and "visitation" with the terms "time-sharing" and "parental responsibility" in 2008. Time-sharing refers to the physical schedule, while parental responsibility refers to decision-making authority over major aspects of the child's life. Both are addressed within the parenting plan.
Yes. Florida Statute 61.13 requires a court-approved parenting plan in every case involving minor children, including both divorce cases and paternity cases. The plan must include a time-sharing schedule, an allocation of parental responsibilities, and a communication framework between the parents.
Yes, but only if the requesting parent demonstrates a substantial and material change in circumstances since the last order was entered, and that the proposed modification serves the child's best interests. Informal schedule changes between parents, while sometimes practical, are not enforceable unless they are incorporated into a new court order.
Yes. Florida courts provide approved parenting plan forms, including a standard version and a long-distance or relocation version for cases where parents live far apart. These forms satisfy minimum statutory requirements but often require significant customization to address the specific logistics and anticipated disputes in a given family's situation.
Florida time-sharing disputes can determine how much of your child's daily life you are part of for years to come. Altawil Law Group helps parents across Miami, Palm Beach, and all of Florida build strong, enforceable parenting plans and fight for their children's best interests.
"*" indicates required fields
Our Florida Location
Downtown Miami Office : 169 E Flagler St, Suite 700, Miami, FL 33131
"*" indicates required fields